contest stations generally only want valid contacts (according to the
contest rules) to prevent
a penalty. That also is a thing.

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 2:31 PM Ryan Tourge <ryan.tou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> A bit prissy to exclude a station that lacks a signal report. You both
> ack'd each other. obviously the call took place.
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:53 AM Fred Price <n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ed,
> >
> > You do know that if you are using LoTW to confirm your QSO's then all
> that is needed for a valid QSO is:
> > Exchange of calls
> > Band
> > Date
> > Time +/-30 minutes
> >
> > So it makes no difference if your signal report is a SNR or a grid
> square. However since it is your station it is your choice on how you log.
> > Have fun n enjoy after all it's not life of death it's just a hobby.
> >
> > Fred
> > N2XK
> >
> > On Jul 22, 2019 12:01 AM, Ed Muns <e...@w0yk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Great tip, Laurie.
> >
> > This is a good technique if one can reasonably assume that the majority
> of
> > QSO partners sending a signal report will not complete the QSO, or log
> it,
> > if the contester only sends a Grid Square.
> >
> > IOW, if a contester set to NA VHF Contest mode connects up with a
> > "non-contester" set to normal mode (Special Activity unchecked), and both
> > are configured for Auto Seq, then the QSO will complete without any
> operator
> > intervention.  However, the contester will not have sent a signal report
> to
> > the non-contester.  That may be an issue, because the non-contester may
> > continue to send his SNR message, hoping to elicit an SNR in return.
> Or, he
> > may not log the contact because he never received an SNR from the
> contester.
> > This may not be a problem for the contester, because the non-contester is
> > unlikely to submit a Cabrillo log, so the contester will avoid a NIL.
> >
> > Back to your tip of setting up two instances of WSJT-X, one with NA VHF
> > Contest mode enabled and one with Special Activity unchecked.  This is a
> > good technique for the contester to get another QSO in the log that
> > otherwise would not happen, IF the assumption is the majority of "mixed"
> > QSOs as described above will not complete successfully because the
> > non-contester is concerned that he didn't receive a signal report.
> >
> > The contester has to decide whether to power through the QSO in the NA
> VHF
> > Contest mode, or to on-the-fly switch to his "SNR Configuration" that
> uses
> > the standard non-contest message sequence and indeed sends an SNR
> message to
> > the non-contester.
> >
> > Ed W0YK
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Laurie, VK3AMA <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net>
> > Sent: 21 July, 2019 16:04
> > To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Contest confusion
> >
> > On 22/07/2019 7:16 am, Jim Brown wrote:
> > > so I quickly switched out of contest mode to work him. :)
> > >
> > > What I WOULD like is to able to do this without going to Settings
> > > Advanced. All those clicks loses a TX cycle.
> > >
> > > 73, Jim K9YC
> >
> > Simple and only requires a single mouse click. Setup two configurations
> > in WSJT-X, one for you desired contest and the other non-contest. Once
> > setup, it is a single click using the "Configuration" menu to switch
> > between contest and non-contest.
> >
> > de Laurie VK3AMA
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wsjt-devel mailing list
> > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wsjt-devel mailing list
> > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wsjt-devel mailing list
> > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to