The ADIF committee apparently thinks all software is easy to change and should
do so to match their intentions.
We unsuccessfully fought this idea so you'll just have to live with what
they've done.
de Mike W9MDB
On Wednesday, July 31, 2019, 10:54:00 AM CDT, Serge Smirnoff R6YY via
wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Hi Dave,
please explain to me what didn’t like my tone? What's wrong? How have I
offended you or someone else?
I would appreciate an explanation of why I speak poorly in a foreign language.
My language is Russian, and I translate letters for you with a dictionary.
But in general, did you understand the problem that I mentioned? It concerns
everyone, and you too.
73, R6YY
31.07.2019 18:22, Dave Slotter, W3DJS пишет:
Bill is spot-on.
The ADIF Committee is the guardian of the ADIF specification, so if you have
concerns w.r.t. how QSO's should be logged, you should direct them there, not
to one of many different applications which rely on the ADIF specification.
(Although based on the tone of your message, I'm not sure the ADIF Committee
would appreciate me directing you to them.) But, I digress.
73,
-- Dave Slotter, W3DJS _______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
