Michael, sorry. I rolled back windows 10. Wsjt x worked fine after that. The "list" would be the drop down list for rig set up in wsjt x. I also use a flex 6600 which has worked flawlessly with wsjt x every time. Thank you for all of your hard work. Rob n1trk
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:25 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > "get on the list" for what? > When you say you rolled back to a previous version you mean Windows or > WSJT-X? > > Mike W9MDB > > > > > On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 08:12:33 AM CDT, N1trk Rob < > litchrob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I use an ft991A, yaesu's most current rig in the hf/vhf line. I had a > hamlib error after a windows update which of course happened Saturday > morning of field day with no internet :). I rolled back to a previous > version and fb. The yaesu ft 991 a has regularly been a bear to > configure. Perhaps we could get on the list as well? (I have no > programming experience worthwhile. [ I do remember error 19, semicolon > expected....] ) I truly appreciate all your hard and VOLUNTEER work, and > graciously submit this for your consideration. > 73 > rob > n1trk > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:45 AM Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> > wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > we have had one report of a failure which turned out to be a CAT baud rate > setting issue. As far as I know it faithfully emulated the FT-817ND and > that model can be used without change, surprisingly including the EEPROM > reads that are used when being forced to use the FT-857 model backend. I > would have thought that there are enough FT-818NDs out their with WSJT-X to > say that there's no issue. > > Note I cannot say much about the FT-817ND backend as in the Hamlib shipped > with WSJT-X v2.2.2 that model is broken as is the FT-897. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > On 02/07/2020 13:21, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: > > Bill..have you found the FT-818ND to be compatible with the FT-817ND > backend? > Perhaps should add that to the riglist so they don't feel like orphans. > > Mike W9MDB > > > > > On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 07:15:04 AM CDT, Bill Somerville > <g4...@classdesign.com> <g4...@classdesign.com> wrote: > > > On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote: > > On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > > Many thanks, Bill ! > > there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new > FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have > workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to > answer? > > > I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain > informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. > > Thank you ! > > Best wishes, > Claude (DJ0OT) > > Hi Claude, > > there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all > essentially have identical CAT protocols. > > - The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be > queried or set. > - There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is > current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of frequency > and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory. > - The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not > work as advertised. > - CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND > mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front panel VFO > knob when transmitting. > > As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones > are not particularly better or worse than others. > > 73 > > Bill > > G4WJS. > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
