On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote:
On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:

Many thanks, Bill !

there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer?

I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past.

Thank you !

Best wishes,
Claude (DJ0OT)

Hi Claude,

there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all essentially have identical CAT protocols.

 * The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be
   queried or set.
 * There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is
   current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of
   frequency and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory.
 * The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not
   work as advertised.
 * CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND
   mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front
   panel VFO knob when transmitting.

As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones are not particularly better or worse than others.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to