Would 1838 not be a better choice, there's not much JT65 or JT9 these days and FST4 replaces them.
Jim Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Makes sense. More questions, which came up first time I tried to use FST4 > on 160M, set up at 1839 kHz dial, 1050 Hz offset (I have a trash intermod > carrier at 1840). If I set my K3 DSP IF (2.8 kHz roofing filter) for 3.2 > kHz, normal for most WSJT-X modes (or even 2.8 kHz), AGC (and dynamic > range) can be dominated by strong FT8 signals. As a retired serious pro > audio guy, I have long understood the implications of phase shift from > high Q filters, but it does seem that either 1) 1839 is not a great choice > or 2) I may need to judiciously set the HF corner a bit lower. > -- Brian G3VGZ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
