Are you all thinking something similar to how RDS works with broadcast signals or are you thinking something more robust due to the weak signal characteristics of FT8? I can definitely think of some applications for disabled ops to allow them to augment other appliances helping them on the air.
Jim S. N2ADV > On Sep 23, 2021, at 2:18 PM, Glenn M-H via wsjt-devel > <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > Maybe a sound processing system can analyze the sound signal and place the > FT8 signal between the lowest human harmonic frequencies greater than 300Hz. > > After a compressor/clipper a bandwidth (50-100Hz?) with some center frequency > automatically chosen above, should be notched out - and the FT8 signal > inserted here. The FT8 signal must be inserted, after the non-linear > compressor/clipper, so the FT8 signal is not subjected to non-linearity. > > OZ1HFT > > - > >> Den 23. sep. 2021 kl. 19.27 skrev Philip Gladstone >> <pjsg-w...@nospam.gladstonefamily.net>: >> >> I think that it would be an interesting experiment to transmit voice on SSB >> with a continuous FT8 transmission (maybe at around the 1kHz offset) and see >> whether there is a combination of offset & volume difference that makes the >> FT8 decodable if the SSB is barely understandable or better, and yet have >> the FT8 transmission be essentially inaudible. >> >> I'd like the FT8 transmission to just send the sender's callsign and locator >> and not much else. This could be entirely automated by the >> radio/microphone/speech processor/whatever. >> >> Philip >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
