Hi Jim,

Hence the suggestion to make it optional.

Perhaps there should be a penalty for not being courteous on the bands. I can 
live with that.

I always had to laugh when I read the discussions on the RTTY lists after a 
contest. It's full of complaints about operators sending a character too many 
here and there.

We're in a bad place if sending a 73, which is done in almost every other mode 
(including RTTY contests back when I participated), is too much to ask for.

One can hardly argue that fully automatic operations (including logging) is a 
bad thing if sending a 73 is too much to ask for.

73,
--Alex KR1ST

On Oct 4, 2021, 2:43 AM, at 2:43 AM, Jim Brown via wsjt-devel 
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>On 10/3/2021 7:50 PM, Alex via wsjt-devel wrote:
>> No 73, no QSO. I really don't care if that means my log will be a few
>
>> Q's short. The world is already rude enough as it is. We can take a
>few
>> moments to be courteous.
>
>Not when there's short band opening for DX, and not in a contest. :)
>When the other station sends RRR or RR73 and I immediately call CQ, he
>should know that I copied it. If I didn't, I'd send R-10 again. And if
>you re-send R-10, I know you didn't get my RRR or RR73, so I re-send
>it.
>This stuff is LOOONG established practice on the HF bands, especially
>for contesting and DX pileups. Indeed, the most discourteous thing we
>can do with working a contest (or in a DX opening) is to make the 
>contact take longer to complete -- it slows the other station down!
>
>Contest rules penalize you if a QSO in your log is not in the other
>station's log, and it's often the loss of ANOTHER QSO. Failing to
>understand these issues has driven RTTY contesters crazy when FT8 and
>FT4 were added to RTTY Roundup, and when those same RTTY contesters
>worked to set up a pure digital contest.
>
>73, Jim K9YC
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>wsjt-devel mailing list
>wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to