On Apr 24, 2023, at 8:36 AM, K9RX <arsk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not to belabor the point…. I too was rejected although I’m still able to see
> posts – just can’t respond. My failing? I posted a comment saying how I had
> 92 decodes in one sequence using WSJT and I congratulated the creators of the
> program – kudos I said. I followed by the benign statement “JTDX had 94 the
> following sequence – essentially the same” … the whole post was not posted. I
> asked why – he responded with this tirade of how he has stated time and again
> NOT to post about derivatives… I apologized and said I was unaware of that –
> that I was a casual poster. He called me a liar. I told him I believe
> sincerely in honesty and integrity – apologized again - he doubled down.
> After that he wouldn’t respond. So YES – there IS someone there and HE alone
> is making these decisions. My suggestion to him: get a life. Stop being an
> ass to others who sincerely are not trying to disrespect WSJT.
>
> Gary
> K9RX
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
>
Hmmm…. That explains something I experienced.
A few weeks ago I posted a comment about how I’d just decoded 100 stations for
the first time in a single sequence. I thought that was pretty amazing and
said so. There was no mention of any alternative software or any of that.
Just plain straight praise.
I should say that I *tried* to post that comment. It never made it and I had
no idea why.
Oh well…
73,
Clarke K1JX
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
