Michael, My vote is we have beat this issue to death several times over. Pick any language, as it evolves words take on new meanings or nuances. Can we maybe let this one go?
John K7SYS On Mon, May 8, 2023, 09:37 Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > And ya'll are confusing the purpose of split with the rig split function. > > We have 3 choices > > #1 Fake It > #2 Rig > #3 None > > The all refer to split -- not to any reason for using it. You are trying > to put the reason as the title. > > Mike W9MDB > > > > > On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 10:51:17 AM CDT, Adrian via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > No, leave the split rig/fake checkpoints, as is, but place within a > field/box titled 'Signal Optimization' , > > which should be an easy ui update ? > > No need to remove rig split or fake split, because that is what is > activated via CAT. > > > 73 > > > vk4tux > On 9/5/23 01:42, Alan wrote: > > I think I suggested something similar much earlier in the thread. > > However with that new name rig and fake it don't mean anything so I'd > suggest change to hardware and software respectively. > > Alan G0TLK, sent from my mobile device > > On 8 May 2023 16:37:35 Adrian via wsjt-devel > <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > wrote: > > Sam, That is what I mentioned earlier, however 'Signal Optimization' makes > more sense, > > as that is the end result. > > > 73 > > > vk4tux > On 9/5/23 01:28, Sam Birnbaum via groups.io wrote: > > Hi All, > > As a retired software developer with extensive UI development experience, > may I make a suggestion to > whomever is in charge of the UI, to change this part of the display in > Radio Settings tab from what is the > current version (left side) to this new version (right side) and explain > its function in the WSJT-X manual/ > > > [image: ChangeRadioSetting.jpg] > > This removes the ambiguity and confusion regarding the use of the word > SPLIT. > > > 73, > > > Sam W2JDB > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Cc: Adrian <vk4...@gmail.com> <vk4...@gmail.com> > Sent: Mon, May 8, 2023 10:17 am > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles > > Consistent TX level control, making alc minimum set easier for whole pan > TX usage. > > 73 > vk4tux > On 9/5/23 00:08, Björn Ekelund via wsjt-devel wrote: > > So what more does it do? > > Björn SM7IUN > > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 3:43 PM Black Michael <mdblac...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > That's not the only thing it does so that's not a good choice. Nobody has > every come up with anything better than Split. > Let's just learn that Split from 50 years ago has changed and is much more > flexible now than before. > > Mike W9MDB > > > > > On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 08:37:26 AM CDT, Björn Ekelund via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > I propose that the option "Split operation" in the radio settings of > WSJT-X is renamed "Transmit harmonics prevention" > to remove some of the confusion to those who struggle with digital radio > technology. > > The three options below should be "I don't care if I QRM the band", "Use > VFO B", and "Use CAT". > > Björn SM7IUN > > > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 10:24 AM Jim Brown via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On 5/6/2023 10:41 PM, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel wrote: > > This start to be really funny! > > There's a saying in the States that "you can't argue with a drunk." A > corollary is that it's a waste of time to one who only wants the world > to tell him he's right. > > The story related in your post is perfect! > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing > listwsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > -- > 73, > > Sam W2JDB > _._,_._,_ > ------------------------------ > Groups.io Links: > > You receive all messages sent to this group. > > View/Reply Online (#206) <https://groups.io/g/wsjtgroup/message/206> | Reply > To Group > <wsjtgr...@groups.io?subject=Re:%20%5Bwsjtgroup%5D%20Enhancement%20suggestion%20-%2030%20second%20cycles> > | Reply To Sender > <w2...@aol.com?subject=Private:%20Re:%20%5Bwsjtgroup%5D%20Enhancement%20suggestion%20-%2030%20second%20cycles> > | Mute This Topic <https://groups.io/mt/98763644/1015776> | New Topic > <https://groups.io/g/wsjtgroup/post> > Your Subscription <https://groups.io/g/wsjtgroup/editsub/1015776> | Contact > Group Owner <wsjtgroup+ow...@groups.io> | Unsubscribe > <https://groups.io/g/wsjtgroup/leave/12251959/1015776/1415934963/xyzzy> [ > vk4...@gmail.com] > _._,_._,_ > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
