Or, pick words that don’t have a meaning yet. Like call it “TX Optimizan” with choices like “none” “active” and “emulate” . I am joking.
-Brian N9ADG
Sent via iPhone
On May 8, 2023, at 11:18 AM, John Kludt via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Michael,
My vote is we have beat this issue to death several times over. Pick any language, as it evolves words take on new meanings or nuances. Can we maybe let this one go?
John K7SYS
And ya'll are confusing the purpose of split with the rig split function.
We have 3 choices
#1 Fake It
#2 Rig
#3 None
The all refer to split -- not to any reason for using it. You are trying to put the reason as the title.
Mike W9MDB
No, leave the split rig/fake checkpoints, as is, but place within
a field/box titled 'Signal Optimization' ,
which should be an easy ui update ?
No need to remove rig split or fake split, because that is what
is activated via CAT.
73
vk4tux
On 9/5/23 01:42, Alan wrote:
I think I suggested something similar much
earlier in the thread.
However with that new name rig and fake it don't
mean anything so I'd suggest change to hardware and software
respectively.
Alan G0TLK, sent from my mobile device
On 8 May 2023 16:37:35
Adrian via wsjt-devel
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Sam, That is what I mentioned earlier, however
'Signal Optimization' makes more sense,
as that is the end result.
73
vk4tux
On 9/5/23 01:28, Sam
Birnbaum via
groups.io wrote:
Hi
All,
As a retired software developer
with extensive UI development
experience, may I make a
suggestion to
whomever is
in charge of the UI, to change
this part of the display in
Radio Settings tab from what is
the
current
version (left side) to this new
version ( right
side) and explain its function
in the WSJT-X manual/
This removes the ambiguity and
confusion regarding the use of the
word SPLIT.
73,
-----Original
Message-----<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> <vk4...@gmail.com>
Consistent TX level
control, making alc
minimum set easier for
whole pan TX usage.
73
vk4tux
On
9/5/23 00:08, Björn
Ekelund via
wsjt-devel wrote:
So what
more does it do?
That's
not the only
thing it does
so that's not
a good
choice.
Nobody has
every come up
with anything
better than
Split.
Let's
just learn
that Split
from 50 years
ago has
changed and is
much more
flexible now
than before.
Mike
W9MDB
I
propose that
the option
"Split
operation" in
the radio
settings of
WSJT-X is
renamed
"Transmit
harmonics
prevention"
to
remove some of
the confusion
to those who
struggle with
digital radio
technology.
The three
options below
should be "I
don't care if
I QRM the
band", "Use
VFO B", and
"Use CAT".
Björn
SM7IUN
On
5/6/2023 10:41
PM, Reino
Talarmo via
wsjt-devel
wrote:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_._,_._,_
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#206)
| Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [vk4...@gmail.com ]
_._,_._,_
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel 