Hi all,

We know how sensitive the SuperFox mode is. Here are some details, computed by our simulation test program for the "Mid-latitude Moderate" channel. We used 10000 simulated transmissions for each SNR in the table.

Code: QPC(127,50)  Q:128   NDS:151  NSPS:1024  Baud:11.719  BW: 1512.
Channel: MM TxT:12.9 SyncType: 1 Iters: 10000 Depth:5 dth:0.70 damp:1.00

     SNR  Eb/No  fsync   fgood    wer     uer    rmsf rmst  tdec
      dB   dB                                     Hz   ms     s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
   -8.00  11.07 0.99990 0.99990 0.00010 0.00000  0.28  1.3 0.005
   -9.00  10.07 1.00000 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000  0.35  1.5 0.005
  -10.00   9.07 0.99940 0.99890 0.00110 0.00000  0.42  1.7 0.005
  -11.00   8.07 0.99900 0.99840 0.00160 0.00000  0.51  1.9 0.006
  -12.00   7.07 0.99750 0.99480 0.00520 0.00000  0.63  2.1 0.006
  -13.00   6.07 0.99530 0.98330 0.01670 0.00000  0.74  2.4 0.009
  -14.00   5.07 0.98880 0.92600 0.07400 0.00000  0.93  2.8 0.021
  -15.00   4.07 0.97840 0.71720 0.28280 0.00010  1.10  3.3 0.063
  -16.00   3.07 0.95490 0.24070 0.75930 0.00010  1.31  3.8 0.147
  -17.00   2.07 0.92350 0.01270 0.98730 0.00010  1.54  4.4 0.175
  -18.00   1.07 0.87330 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000  1.65  5.2 0.176

Threshold sensitivity (50% decoding): -15.5 dB

You can probably figure out what the column headings mean. On this channel, the 50% decoding threshold occurs for the SuperFox waveform at SNR = -15.5 dB.

If Fox operated using single-stream FT8, you could copy him most of the time down to about -17 dB. Occasionally a little weaker, depending on channel details. To work him when he's using a single stream, you'd need to get in line and it might be a long wait.

If Fox was using two or more old-style F+H streams, his signal would be much weaker: -6 dB for two streams, -14 dB for 5 streams.

The SuperFox signal is the same strength, independent of how many Hounds he's working, and (on the Mid-latitude Moderate channel) the 50% decoding threshold is -15.5 dB.

        -- 73, Joe, K1JT


_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to