YES you're right about that!

Inviato da Outlook per Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: Larry Banks via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2025 9:25:31 AM
To: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Larry Banks <larryb.w1...@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hi Marco,

The drop in traffic is also caused by the stability of WSJT-X.  Stable = few 
questions.

73 -- Larry -- W1DYJ




On 5/31/2025 22:08, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Lance,

I'm using FT8 for the 99% of my ham radio activity.

I don't know Q65 mode at all, nor EME QSO.

I asked such question because I was sort of worry about a possible WSJTX EOL, 
due the recent drop of traffic noticed in this mailing list.

It was only a feeling, of course I am super happy that I'm completely wrong!

73s Marco PY1ZRJ

Inviato da Outlook per Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: Lance Collister, W7GJ via wsjt-devel 
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 10:23:09 PM
To: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel 
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Lance Collister, W7GJ <w...@bigskyspaces.com><mailto:w...@bigskyspaces.com>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hi Marco,

I am not sure why you are asking your question. Q65-60A with Q65 Pileup option 
is now
the standard mode used worldwide for 6m EME, and other Q65 modes are widely 
used on
other EME bands. In addition, FT8 mode continues to be the favored mode on 6m 
and
many HF bands, because of its great sensitivity.

WSJT-X has revolutionized amateur radio, and has made challenging things like 
6m EME
DXpeditions POSSIBLE! MNI MNI thanks to K1JT and the entire WSJT-X team!

VY 73, Lance

On 6/1/2025 00:07:38, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm feeling kind of premonition that WSJT-X could has reached its End Of Life?
>
> I don't see many messages here on the mailing-list from some time, and this 
> is not
> a good sign for me.
>
> Of course I hope that my feelings being wrong, but I would like to know 
> better from
> someone that has the answer.
>
> Thanks!
> ---
> *73 de Marco, PY1ZRJ (former IK5BCU)*
> **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

--
Lance Collister, W7GJ(ex WA3GPL, WA1JXN, WA1JXN/C6A, ZF2OC/ZF8, E51SIX, 3D2LR, 
5W0GJ, E6M, TX5K, KH8/W7GJ, V6M, T8GJ, VK9CGJ, VK9XGJ, C21GJ, CP1GJ, S79GJ, 
FO/W7GJ, TX7MB, TO7GJ, 3B9GJ, ZD9GJ, H40GJ)
P.O. Box 73
Frenchtown, MT   59834-0073
USA
TEL: (406) 626-5728
QTH: DN27ub
URL: http://www.bigskyspaces.com/w7gj
Skype: lanceW7GJ
2m DXCC #11 - 6m DXCC #815 - FFMA #7

Interested in 6m EME?  Ask me about subscribing to the new Magic Band EME
email group, or just fill in the request box at the bottom of my web
page (above)!



_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel




_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to