Sorry for breaking in without having enough technical knowledge in the specific matter.
I would ask regarding a possibility to get a sort of digital against analogic emission for FT8, as we can see with the FREEDV project. Probably I'm talking about something completely unrelated, but this just came in my mind right now. Thanks and regards! Marco PY1ZRJ Inviato da Outlook per Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 1:14:24 AM To: 'WSJT software development' <[email protected]> Cc: Reino Talarmo <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hello Take, Currently the bandwidth WSJT-X supports for all modes is 5kHz. Exception is MSK144 that uses the whole bandwidth 300Hz to 2700Hz of a SSB transmitter. Of course, your radio needs to support the 5 kHz bandwidth. See User Guide 5. Transceiver Setup section ‘Bandwidth and Frequency setting’. 73, Reino OH3mA From: Tsutsumi Takehiko via wsjt-devel <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 6:41 AM To: WSJT software development <[email protected]> Cc: Tsutsumi Takehiko <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hi all, Allow me to make comment on bandwidth topic as I was involved and actually decided FT8 bandwidth as "2kHz" (as I did not know such popularity for FT8) on 40m/80m, wondering the proper spectrum allocation methodology in 2017. "Today, 2025" Yes, it is absolutely inadequate and we should periodically review (not "big step" method mentioned by Andrew) and optimize WSJT-X spectrum based on the actual traffic or popularity basis with future forecast on each band. Regards, take de JA5AEA ________________________________ 差出人: vk3oe via wsjt-devel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 送信: 2025 年 6 月 2 日 (月曜日) 12:09 宛先: WSJT software development <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: vk3oe <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 件名: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? WSJT-X the next big step is to use much wider bandwidths, 10kHz and up. Andrew VK3OE. Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message -------- From: Larry Banks via wsjt-devel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: 1/6/25 11:07 pm (GMT+10:00) To: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Larry Banks <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hi Marco, The drop in traffic is also caused by the stability of WSJT-X. Stable = few questions. 73 -- Larry -- W1DYJ On 5/31/2025 22:08, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Lance, I'm using FT8 for the 99% of my ham radio activity. I don't know Q65 mode at all, nor EME QSO. I asked such question because I was sort of worry about a possible WSJTX EOL, due the recent drop of traffic noticed in this mailing list. It was only a feeling, of course I am super happy that I'm completely wrong! 73s Marco PY1ZRJ Inviato da Outlook per Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Lance Collister, W7GJ via wsjt-devel <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 10:23:09 PM To: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Lance Collister, W7GJ <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hi Marco, I am not sure why you are asking your question. Q65-60A with Q65 Pileup option is now the standard mode used worldwide for 6m EME, and other Q65 modes are widely used on other EME bands. In addition, FT8 mode continues to be the favored mode on 6m and many HF bands, because of its great sensitivity. WSJT-X has revolutionized amateur radio, and has made challenging things like 6m EME DXpeditions POSSIBLE! MNI MNI thanks to K1JT and the entire WSJT-X team! VY 73, Lance On 6/1/2025 00:07:38, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote: > Hello, > > I'm feeling kind of premonition that WSJT-X could has reached its End Of Life? > > I don't see many messages here on the mailing-list from some time, and this > is not > a good sign for me. > > Of course I hope that my feelings being wrong, but I would like to know > better from > someone that has the answer. > > Thanks! > --- > *73 de Marco, PY1ZRJ (former IK5BCU)* > ** > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel -- Lance Collister, W7GJ(ex WA3GPL, WA1JXN, WA1JXN/C6A, ZF2OC/ZF8, E51SIX, 3D2LR, 5W0GJ, E6M, TX5K, KH8/W7GJ, V6M, T8GJ, VK9CGJ, VK9XGJ, C21GJ, CP1GJ, S79GJ, FO/W7GJ, TX7MB, TO7GJ, 3B9GJ, ZD9GJ, H40GJ) P.O. Box 73 Frenchtown, MT 59834-0073 USA TEL: (406) 626-5728 QTH: DN27ub URL: http://www.bigskyspaces.com/w7gj Skype: lanceW7GJ 2m DXCC #11 - 6m DXCC #815 - FFMA #7 Interested in 6m EME? Ask me about subscribing to the new Magic Band EME email group, or just fill in the request box at the bottom of my web page (above)! _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
