Should we put links to WatiN [1], Watij [2], Win32-Watir [3] and watir-webdriver [4] on watir.com/platforms? For the first three we should make it clear that they are not part of the project, just forks (in wrong languages, as Bret would say it), and for the last one we should make it clear that it is prerelease sofware.
I would also remove ChromeWatir [5] from platforms page. The last time I have tried it was broken. I had a chat with Sai recently (lead of ChromeWatir) and he said he would continue working on Chrome driver. I have tried to convince him to better work on Webdriver's Chrome driver, than to duplicate effort. Sai, what do you think? I talked at a few conferences about Watir [6] and I have noticed that people really like the idea, but sometimes they would prefer implementation in a familiar language. What do you think? [1] http://watin.sourceforge.net/ [2] http://watij.com/ [3] http://search.cpan.org/dist/Win32-Watir/ [4] http://github.com/jarib/watir-webdriver [5] http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/ChromeWatir [6] http://zeljkofilipin.com/category/self-education/events/ Željko -- watir.com - community manager pledgie.com/campaigns/2982 - donate to Watir watirpodcast.com - host testingpodcast.com - audio podcasts on software testing. all of them
_______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
