Hi, I agree with Bret, in that Watij, WatiN etc. are not *forks*, I would call them either a language port or inspired by Watir. I also agree these don't belong on watir.com.
On a side note, as mentioned recently on my blog ( http://watirmelon.com/2010/04/10/watir-selenium-webdriver/), I personally believe these tools (like Watij, WatiN) will see their usage fall as more developers simply use the WebDriver functionality in what ever language they like (in this case Java or .NET). I also agree that we should remove information about ChromeWatir from watir.com (http://watir.com/platforms/), but I don't think Watir-WebDriver is at a point where we can recommend it instead. I personally have quite a few issues I need to raise against Watir-WebDriver. Is the plan for fully supporting Watir-WebDriver clear at this stage? Is there an official release planned? Cheers, Alister Scott Brisbane, Australia Watir Web Master: http://watir.com Blog: http://watirmelon.com Google: http://www.google.com/profiles/alister.scott LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alisterscott On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Željko Filipin < [email protected]> wrote: > 2010/4/12 Bret Pettichord <[email protected]> > > This includes a mention of BrowserUnit > > It looks dead to me. > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/browserunit/ > > "jonathankohl committed revision 39 to the browserUnit SVN repository, > changing 1 files posted by jonathankohl 1276 days ago" > > Željko > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development >
_______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
