Would it be possible to outline the pros and cons of each implementation so that it removes any confusion
my 2 cents Basim On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Željko Filipin < [email protected]> wrote: > Should we put links to WatiN [1], Watij [2], Win32-Watir [3] and > watir-webdriver [4] on watir.com/platforms? For the first three we should > make it clear that they are not part of the project, just forks (in wrong > languages, as Bret would say it), and for the last one we should make it > clear that it is prerelease sofware. > > I would also remove ChromeWatir [5] from platforms page. The last time I > have tried it was broken. I had a chat with Sai recently (lead of > ChromeWatir) and he said he would continue working on Chrome driver. I have > tried to convince him to better work on Webdriver's Chrome driver, than to > duplicate effort. Sai, what do you think? > > I talked at a few conferences about Watir [6] and I have noticed that > people really like the idea, but sometimes they would prefer implementation > in a familiar language. > > What do you think? > > [1] http://watin.sourceforge.net/ > [2] http://watij.com/ > [3] http://search.cpan.org/dist/Win32-Watir/ > [4] http://github.com/jarib/watir-webdriver > [5] http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/ChromeWatir > [6] http://zeljkofilipin.com/category/self-education/events/ > > Željko > -- > watir.com - community manager > pledgie.com/campaigns/2982 - donate to Watir > watirpodcast.com - host > testingpodcast.com - audio podcasts on software testing. all of them > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development >
_______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
