James Graham wrote:
...
Nevertheless, for better or worse the charter puts the burden of proof
on those wishing for a formal decision to be made to demonstrate that
the decision is needed for progress. Is there a documented reason that
this particular decision was so important that it should circumvent the
usual proposal-draft-feedback-redraft cycle? We have recently seen the
...
My understanding of that cycle (*) is that it implies that there's no
way to get something into the spec the editor doesn't want in there.
That would be a problem.
BR, Julian
(*) as currently practiced
