On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:38:41 +0900, Eric Kow <eric....@gmail.com> wrote: > Is this the right approach? > > Wed Apr 8 11:38:47 BST 2009 Eric Kow <e.y....@brighton.ac.uk> > * Move wxcore.cabal to wxcore and use Simple build method. > The assumption here is that the automatically generated files have already > been built. > > Fri Apr 10 15:50:29 BST 2009 Eric Kow <e.y....@brighton.ac.uk> > * Split wxcore-only into wxcore-gen and wxcore-libs. > > Fri Apr 10 15:50:48 BST 2009 Eric Kow <e.y....@brighton.ac.uk> > * Do not build wxcore in the default target (let that be a separate cabal > step).
Yes. We can make binary distribution now. But you forgot to add wxcore-install. This means that we must build wxcore twice when we want to build binary distribution. So, I added more 1 patch for adding wxcore-install target. Best Regards, -- shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/
binrDG1pCUmbi.bin
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
