I pushed these changes now, thanks.

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:25:25 +0900, shelarcy <shela...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is this the right approach?
>>
>> Wed Apr  8 11:38:47 BST 2009  Eric Kow <e.y....@brighton.ac.uk>
>>   * Move wxcore.cabal to wxcore and use Simple build method.
>>   The assumption here is that the automatically generated files have already
>>   been built.
>>
>> Fri Apr 10 15:50:29 BST 2009  Eric Kow <e.y....@brighton.ac.uk>
>>   * Split wxcore-only into wxcore-gen and wxcore-libs.
>>
>> Fri Apr 10 15:50:48 BST 2009  Eric Kow <e.y....@brighton.ac.uk>
>>   * Do not build wxcore in the default target (let that be a separate cabal 
>> step).
>
> Yes. We can make binary distribution now.
>
> But you forgot to add wxcore-install. This means that we must build
> wxcore twice when we want to build binary distribution. So, I added
> more 1 patch for adding wxcore-install target.

-- 
shelarcy <shelarcy    hotmail.co.jp>
http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
wxhaskell-devel mailing list
wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel

Reply via email to