On 28 Nov 2011, at 18:09, Maciek Makowski wrote: > I don't have a strong opinion on which version of wx should be > supported by wxHaskell, as long as there is at least one that works on > Windows without the need to compile wxWidgets from source. Until there > is a wxPack available for 2.9 I fear that the majority of Windows > users will be stuck with wxHaskell versions that work with 2.8.
Probably not an issue as the proposal would only affect devel versions of wxHaskell (as I understand it) As a general principle, I guess hackage versions should always support the stable versions of the underlying wxWidgets. This means making sure we've got 2.8 support until 3.0 comes out, and also making sure we can cope with the 3.0 release -- Eric Kow <http://erickow.com> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
