Francesco Montorsi wrote: > I'll look at the diffs of the Makefile.in trying to look if I can get > applications to link against versioned libraries of wxLua, i.e. the > *-2.8.0.0.0.dylib libraries. > > That is the right thing to do, isn't it? > > Also, is it common on Mac to have versioned libraries named like > *-2.8.0.0.0.dylib (5 numbers!)?
The name of the library is "libwx_macu-2.8" (i.e. 2.8 is part of name) The API (major) version is 0, thus libwx_macu-2.8.0.dylib (the lib id) The implementation/minor version is 0.0.0, yielding all five numbers: libwx_macu-2.8.dylib -> libwx_macu-2.8.0.dylib libwx_macu-2.8.0.dylib -> libwx_macu-2.8.0.0.0.dylib libwx_macu-2.8.0.0.0.dylib I think it's done the same way on Linux ? The first library/symlink is only for developer use, since programs link to an API version. (only that Macs are more sensitive to the file suffix, than Linux) libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so -> libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so.0 libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so.0 -> libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so.0.0.0 libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so.0.0.0 > I don't have the non-corrupted version of wxLua.icns... could you send > it to me then? http://www.algonet.se/~afb/wx/wxLua.icns http://www.algonet.se/~afb/wx/wxLua.r.gz > this is not a bug. This is wanted. Better not to mess with the wx's > include folder. /usr/local/include/wx (unversioned) is a safer place. Okay, but it didn't seem to find the headers there for some reason ? --anders ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ wxlua-users mailing list wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
