Francesco Montorsi wrote: > I know wx2.8 is widely used and will last for much time; however > building a wx Framework for Mac is extremehely easier in wxTRUNK since > contribs were removed. I think that when wx3.0 will be out, it will > thus > have a wxFramework for the mac world and then building releases for > wx-based software for mac will be much more easier.
It's not impossible to create frameworks for wx 2.6 or 2.8 either, the question is more whether it's a good idea and/or necessary... ? i.e. it's just as easy to include dylibs inside "MacOS" or /usr/local as it is to include frameworks in "Frameworks" and "/Library/Frameworks". > So, I don't know if it's worth the effort to spend much time in making > wx2.8+wxLua installation easier on Mac. Much of that work could become > useless for wx3.0. Assuming that wxWidgets 3.0 is actually going to be a *good* release, unlike the ones from two unnamed proprietary operating system vendors... :-P Then again, it seems that they renumbered wxWidgets 2.10 as 3.0 now, so I might be confused as to what goes into the next "major" release ? --anders ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ wxlua-users mailing list wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
