On Thursday, July 30, 2009, Dodger wrote: > > 2009/7/29 Johan Vromans <jvrom...@squirrel.nl>: > > "Roode, Eric" <ero...@barrack.com> writes: > > > >> I'd like to start. Hopefully, I can write stuff that will be helpful > >> both to newcomers and to experienced WxPerl users. > > > > I seriously doubt whether it is worth the effort to write wxPerl > > specific API documentation. The standard Wx docs are not hard to > > understand once you get used to it. > ... > > -- Johan > > Dude, are you seriously trying to discourage someone from freely > adding WxPerl documentation to make things easier for everyone, in > favour of propagating the existing terrible state of things? That's > f$*%ked up!
You misunderstand. Johan was making a comment about priorities; he feels that efforts would be better spent elsewhere. Not that efforts to improve the doucmentation shouldn't be made at all. I think I disagree with Johan that the wxPerl API documentation shouldn't be translated from C++ to Perl. But I respect and value (and pretty much agree with) his opinions about what other areas of wxPerl documentation need more urgent attention. -- Eric J. Roode
