What version / platform of Xerces 3.x and Xalan are you using? I'm having
trouble compiling Xerces 3.0.1 and Xalan 1.10 on Linux (64bit, gcc 3.4).
Here are a few example errors:
In file included from
/tp64/xalan/c1_10_0_ICU/include/xalanc/PlatformSupport/XSLException.hpp:27,
from
/tp64/xalan/c1_10_0_ICU/include/xalanc/XPath/XalanXPathException.hpp:32,
from
/tp64/xalan/c1_10_0_ICU/include/xalanc/XPath/XObject.hpp:41,
from ../src/core/CFrame.C:13:
/tp64/xalan/c1_10_0_ICU/include/xalanc/PlatformSupport/XalanLocator.hpp:62:
error: conflicting return type specified for `virtual XMLSSize_t
xalanc_1_10::XalanLocator::getLineNumber() const'
/home/mrosen/xerces-c-3.0.1-x86_64-linux-gcc-3.4/include/xercesc/sax/Locator.hpp:102:
error: overriding `virtual XMLFileLoc
xercesc_3_0::Locator::getLineNumber() const'
/tp64/xalan/c1_10_0_ICU/include/xalanc/PlatformSupport/XalanLocator.hpp:65:
error: conflicting return type specified for `virtual XMLSSize_t
xalanc_1_10::XalanLocator::getColumnNumber() const'
/home/mrosen/xerces-c-3.0.1-x86_64-linux-gcc-3.4/include/xercesc/sax/Locator.hpp:112:
error: overriding `virtual XMLFileLoc
xercesc_3_0::Locator::getColumnNumber() const'
Hans Smit wrote:
>
> I've been working with the Xerces-C v3 / XalanC v1.10
> combination for the past 1-2 years. No problems, very robust.
>
> From what I've heard in the grape vine XalanC v1.11 is in the guise of a
> CVS
> trunk. I have been using this as well - works great! One day it will come
> out as an official release, but I believe that David is very busy at the
> moment.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "SixDegrees" <paulcarli...@comcast.net>
> To: <xalan-c-users@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 17:06
> Subject: XML/Xerces/Xalan
>
>
>>
>> We have a project using Xerces-C v3.01. We would like to add support for
>> XPath queries, and are considering either Xalan-C or XQuilla.
>>
>> Xalan-C seems to have been stuck at v1.10 since 2004, and the online
>> documentation claims it is compatible with Xerces-C v2.70, but nothing
>> higher.
>>
>> XQuilla seems to be less known, and we want something robust and stable.
>> But
>> if Xalan won't work with Xerces 3, we may be forced to shift to something
>> else.
>>
>> Any thoughts on compatibility, ease of use or other issues we may run
>> into
>> when making this choice?
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/XML-Xerces-Xalan-tp22637253p22637253.html
>> Sent from the Xalan - C - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/XML-Xerces-Xalan-tp22637253p23432153.html
Sent from the Xalan - C - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
