Scott, In the DTMDefaultBase code what elements of the constructor are required if we are not creating a DTM for an existing DOM. I.e. for the SQL extensions, do I create a constructor that just takes a DTMBuilder ?? Thanks John G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For the time being, yes, they are not used. The idea is that these become > the small footprint version of the DTM. But they aren't yet ready. Sorry > for the confusion. > > -scott > > > Ovidiu > Predescu To: Scott Boag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Gary L Peskin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > p.com> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent by: Subject: [DTM] DTMDocumentImpl and >DTMBuilder unused? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > .com > > > 06/27/2001 > 02:25 AM > > > > Hi, > > I finally found some time to sit down and start migrating my source > information > patch from the stree model to the new DTM model. As I've been looking at > the > source code, I stumbled across DTMDocumentImpl and DTMBuilder classes, > which > don't seem to be used anywhere in the code. Is my understanding correct > here? > > Regards, > -- > Ovidiu Predescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://orion.nsr.hp.com/ (inside HP's firewall only) > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/7464/ (GNU, Emacs, other > stuff) -- -------------------------------------- John Gentilin SMART911 18314 Carlwyn Drive Castro Valley CA 94546 Contact Info [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone 1-510-881-4821 --------------------------------------
begin:vcard n:Gentilin;John tel;fax:510-727-0931 tel;work:510-881-4821 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.smart911.com org:SMART911;Development adr:;;18314 Carlwyn Drive;Castro Valley;CA;94546;USA version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:CTO fn:John Gentilin end:vcard
