I'm not sure where DTMBuilder get's involved here.  As I said, that code's
ot really being used right now.  I would ignore it.

For the SQLExtension, it will certainly need a DTMManager and dtmIdentity.
You can probably ignore the whiteSpaceFilter for now (pass null).  It
definately needs an xstringfactory I think.  Your choice about doIndexing.

The dtmIdentity can be obtained via DTMManagerDefault#getFirstFreeDTMID().
Once the DTM is created, you have to add it to the manager via
DTMManagerDefault#addDTM(DTM dtm, int id).

The APIs for DTM construction need some work.  But they ought to do the
trick for the time being.

-scott




                                                                                       
                             
                    John Gentilin                                                      
                             
                    <jgentilin@sma        To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]             
                             
                    rt911.com>            cc:     (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)          
                             
                                          Subject:     Re: [DTM] DTMDocumentImpl and 
DTMBuilder unused?             
                    06/27/2001                                                         
                             
                    11:33 AM                                                           
                             
                    Please respond                                                     
                             
                    to xalan-dev                                                       
                             
                                                                                       
                             
                                                                                       
                             




Scott,

In the DTMDefaultBase code what elements of the constructor are required
if we are not creating a DTM for an existing DOM. I.e. for the SQL
extensions,
do I create a constructor that just takes a DTMBuilder ??

Thanks
John G

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> For the time being, yes, they are not used.  The idea is that these
become
> the small footprint version of the DTM.  But they aren't yet ready.
Sorry
> for the confusion.
>
> -scott
>
>
>                     Ovidiu
>                     Predescu             To:     Scott Boag
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gary L Peskin
>                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>                     p.com>               cc:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                     Sent by:             Subject:     [DTM]
DTMDocumentImpl and DTMBuilder unused?
>                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                     .com
>
>
>                     06/27/2001
>                     02:25 AM
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I finally found some time to sit down and start migrating my source
> information
> patch from the stree model to the new DTM model. As I've been looking at
> the
> source code, I stumbled across DTMDocumentImpl and DTMBuilder classes,
> which
> don't seem to be used anywhere in the code. Is my understanding correct
> here?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ovidiu Predescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://orion.nsr.hp.com/ (inside HP's firewall only)
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/7464/ (GNU, Emacs, other
> stuff)

--

--------------------------------------
John Gentilin
SMART911
18314 Carlwyn Drive
Castro Valley CA 94546

    Contact Info
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone 1-510-881-4821
--------------------------------------

(See attached file: jgentilin.vcf)

jgentilin.vcf

Reply via email to