Re: Protocol doesn't support output

[David_Marston]

Tom Amiro wrote:
>But I kinda like "output" as the function/element name better than
>"redirect". XSLT users would find "output"  easier to remember,
>since it already controls various aspects of the output from
>a transformation. Saxon also uses "output".

I think we should be careful to make our names distinct from those
that belong to generic XSLT. In XSLT 2.0, this same capability
should be built-in and might be called "xsl:document" if nobody
objects to that name.
.................David Marston