Chris McCabe wrote:
> Without thinking too much about the consequences, it seems to me that
> Sun should not expose anything beyond the TrAX interface to Xalan, and
> provide only the standard functionality. This would allow them to
> change implementations at some point if they wanted to, without breaking
> anything.
> Is someone specifically needs Xalan, they should include it themselves,
> and it should be able to live peacefully alongside Sun's internal
> implementation (so the classnames would have to change).
^not ??
I believe this is Sun's goal and the reason why they plan to rename
packages in a future version of the JDK.
-Edwin
