On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Adam Jenkins > <adamjenkinstmpredir...@yahoo.com.au> > >> 2) Slow Performance (relative to Saxon) > > I don't think Xalan is slower, as compared to Saxon or any other XSLT > engine, if you are working in XSLT 1.0 mode.
As always, it depends on your usage but saxon is pretty well optimized and worked significantly faster in benchmarks we created for our typical usage. Being able to use XSLT 2 is a big advantage too. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xalan-dev-unsubscr...@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: xalan-dev-h...@xml.apache.org
