On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Andy Chambers <achambers.h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > As always, it depends on your usage but saxon is pretty well optimized > and worked significantly faster in benchmarks we created for our typical > usage.
Personally speaking, I haven't observed any slowness with Xalan. I haven't seen any industry standard benchmarks which compare performance of XSLT engines. Any XSLT benchmarks that are available, I think are either proprietary, and cater to a limited complexity of use cases (i.e, are not fully generic). XSLT stylesheets can be very diverse, so saying that some processor is faster by measuring the performance for certain kinds of stylesheets cannot be extrapolated universally. > Being able to use XSLT 2 is a big advantage too. Yes definitely, there is not doubt about this :) -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xalan-dev-unsubscr...@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: xalan-dev-h...@xml.apache.org
