-----Original Message-----
From: Coach Wei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: XAP Release 0.5.0

+1 to what has been said from Martin and Robert. 

+1 for doing another reelase. It has been a while since the last
release. Where are we in the process?

We are waiting for the committers and community to look of the package
that was posted and vote +1 or -1 depending what they find.

Bob (Buffone)
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: XAP Release 0.5.0
> 
> On Feb 6, 2008 3:22 AM, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martin,
> >
> > We have exchanged emails on this topic before and even spoken in 
> > person about XAP.  I as you have encouraged the XAP team to ONLY 
> > communicate via the mailing list.  So let me ask again to 
> everyone involved in XAP.
> >
> > XAP Committers
> > Everyone has worked hard on this project for the last year 
> and a half, 
> > I have over 2500 emails in my Jira folder and a 1093 in the commits 
> > folder. This is only 50% of what we need to do, let's be diligent 
> > about using the mailing list, and building community.
> >
> > A great code base isn't enough.
> 
> yeh  (that's the slightly frustrating thing)
> 
> there are so many reasons why an active list is good
> 
> when accessing an open source project, lots of people look 
> for activity on the mailing lists
> 
> the mailing list creates document for the project. 
> discussions on list are indexed by search engines and provide 
> a rich description of what the project is all about.
> 
> there's the social side: it's really cool collaborating with 
> people scattered across the world. IMHO the general attritude 
> to posters here is good but an inactive list discourages posters.
> 
> using open mailing lists is designing for serendipity: some 
> of the most fun stuff happens when someone just shows up on a 
> list and say "here we can do this"
> 
> - robert
> 

Reply via email to