On May 26, 2009, at 9:44 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On May 22, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Jacek Laskowski
<[email protected]> wrote:
One (small) step at a time? :) I'll give it a shot ->
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-129
Done. It turned out very easy. Thanks for encouragement :)
I'm not very happy with the current way this is implemented. I
guess my fundamental point of view is that shading is only needed
when you don't have good classloaders such as osgi or (some version
of) the geronimo ones. I don't think the core xbean libraries
should make such assumptions about classloaders but should assume
good classloading.
So I'd prefer that the core xbean libraries use plan asm and that we
provide shaded xbean libraries that use the shaded asm jar. If no
one objects I'm happy to set this up.
Ok, the end result will be the same for any G assemblies that pull in
OpenEJB. I.e. OpenEJB needs to satisfy the embedded scenario where
there are just plain classloaders, so the end result is that xbean-
finder + xbean-reflect + xbean-asm-shaded are still going to be
required as they are now (or some equivalent form of them).
-David
