Can we go back and discuss whether it's possible to: "keep a 'normal' "sub
verbo" term and create a "sub-verbo" locator term", along with "CSL
processors would have to link "sub-verbo" to "sub verbo"" (see my earlier
post).
This way any valid CSL 1.0 style will remain valid (because the locator="sub
verbo" wouldn't pass validation anyway). With only added functionality, this
wouldn't be a backwards-incompatible change. I will be a little messy in the
schema, but we can clean that up in CSL 1.1.
Rintze
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
