>> The point being - if we're actually talking cost benefits, the >> benefits of this are so huge that almost any costs in terms of >> complicating csl are justified. > > Tell that to the implementors (beyond Frank). If they find the > argument compelling and are willing to put in the resources > (time/cash) to seek out these opportunities, then that makes your > case. > > If they won't, then we have a problem. > > ...(snip)... > > Charles, Sylvester, Andrea (who is a legal scholar as well, but as > such, has other responsibilities); what do you think?
It looks like MLZ would be a great addition to CSL, for exactly the reasons stated by Sebastian. We have a number of Papers user that work in law departments or firms, and improved support for citations in this field would be very welcomed. We would definitely start adding support for whatever changes to CSL are necessary. In general, we will follow the CSL improvements and integrate them in Papers asap as they develop. In short: MLZ FTW. I also agree that it is better to keep it as a separate repository for now. It will make sense to integrate it as a version branch when the time comes. charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
