Sigh ... disregard previous. What I meant to say is ... On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Sylvester Keil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'll look into updating the test suite to use the new schema for 1.0.1 >> styles. Incidentally, if I remember correctly, you mentioned that styles >> will keep using '1.0' as their version string – if that's the case, is there >> any straightforward way for processors to distinguish between 1.0 and 1.0.1 >> styles? > > > No.
I still think this issue of versioning and validation is a problem. Bruce >> would you prefer to validate all styles using the 1.0.1 schema? > > > Yes. All current styles in the repo validate against both the CSL 1.0 and > 1.0.1 schema, but that will of course change once we start committing CSL > 1.0.1-only features. > > Rintze > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > xbiblio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
