On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Frank Bennett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Frank Bennett <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:06 PM, G C <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Frank, I tried the latest mlz release with a style which re-defines
> >> ordinals, gender, etc.
> >> This doesn't work.
> >> -limit-day-ordinals-to-day-1="true" has no effect.
> >
> > I haven't implemented that one yet, so no worries there.
> >
> >> -when gender variants are defined in the ordinal suffix terms , there
> is no
> >> output at all with terms other than months (e.g. "edition")
> >> [<term name="ordinal-01" gender-form="feminine"
> >> match="whole-number">ʳᵉ</term>
> >> <term name="ordinal-01" gender-form="masculine"
> >> match="whole-number">ᵉʳ</term>]
> >
> > That's not good. Thanks for the report, I'll take a look.
>
> Is that the entire set of ordinals that are redefined in the style?
> You need to provide the full set, and I think that a default term
> (without gender-form) for each needs to be set. The ordinals travel
> only as a full set.
>
Is that really necessary? The example I wrote up for the specification
doesn't define a genderless "ordinal-01" term.
Rintze
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
