On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Bruce D'Arcus <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sigh ... disregard previous. What I meant to say is ...
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Rintze Zelle <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Sylvester Keil <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'll look into updating the test suite to use the new schema for 1.0.1
> >> styles. Incidentally, if I remember correctly, you mentioned that styles
> >> will keep using '1.0' as their version string – if that's the case, is
> there
> >> any straightforward way for processors to distinguish between 1.0 and
> 1.0.1
> >> styles?
> >
> >
> > No.
>
> I still think this issue of versioning and validation is a problem.
>
Feel free to open a ticket to express your thoughts. I generally agree that
it would be good to have some more discussion about this, but I didn't want
to delay this release any further.
Rintze
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
