APA has a style more similar to the first format for Chicago: Zedeck, S. (Ed.). (2011). /APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Vol. 1. Building and developing the organization/. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://doi.org/10.1037/12169-000
Schmitt, N. W., & Highhouse, S. (Eds.). (2012). /Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology /(2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. http://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385 In general form: Editors. (Year). /Collective title: Vol. number. Volume title./ Place: Publisher. doi The thing that I would want to cite or look for when thinking about these works is "The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology", not "Building and developing the organization". It would be counterintuitive for me (and I imagine most psychologists) to have to store "Building and developing the organization" in the title field. It would make scanning the library and finding the item difficult. It would also mean having to rewrite a lot of translators for psychology sources, where "The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology" would be offered in the metadata as the title. In short, I would be really opposed to Nick Bart's proposal. -- View this message in context: http://xbiblio-devel.2463403.n2.nabble.com/Proposal-new-CSL-variable-multivolume-title-or-similar-rather-than-volume-title-tp7579311p7579425.html Sent from the xbiblio-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xbiblio-devel mailing list xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
