I use zotero and export to bibtex; then pandoc-citeproc runs over the
references.
I usually thought everything works well, until editors and supervisors
complained about the incorrect citation style.

To make it compliant with APA, for now I run pandoc with `--biblatex`
command so that it turns the [@cite1234] into latex citations, and then
compile it with latexmk. Luckily, there is shell scripts to take care
of that, so my workflow does not change too much. I just cannot use the
word-output 'correctly' anymore then.

On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 10:51 -0400, Sebastian Karcher wrote:
> what reference manager are you using? Pandoc? E.g. in Zotero that
> whole idea doesn't exist. You'd have to write out the narrative
> reference in the text. Which has its own downsides, e.g. won't adapt
> to et al. rules if the citation moves.
> 
> I do think we'll need to handle this. It's one of the most frequent
> complaints on Zotero and as Malte notes, it cause reference managers
> that try to implement "narrative" citations to render incorrect
> citations.
> 
> Since it's a relative big change, I'd not expect this to happen fast,
> though.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Malte Roedl <malte.ro...@postgrad.mb
> s.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Thanks for your quick reply, Bruce.
> > 
> > I have created a github issue, but I could unfortunately not tag it
> > as
> > "wontfix" myself.
> > 
> > https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/issues/140
> > 
> > In my case, I will probably use latex (biblatex-apa) for this, as
> > the
> > journal is very picky about their citations.
> > 
> > In case anyone is interested, another option to solve this is to
> > use
> > and="symbol" and use a regex for post-processing.
> > This one works:
> > "([&])(?=\s+(?:[\w-]+ ){1,3}[(])" -> "and"
> > (unless there are punctuation characters in between the ampersand
> > and
> > the year, e.g. for first names, or there is random ampersands
> > followed
> > by brackets in the text)
> > 
> > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 10:31 +0000, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> > > CSL has no concept of a "narrative citation," which would explain
> > why
> > > there's no way to distinguish formatting based on it.
> > > There's been discussions about it, but am not remembering where
> > we
> > > ended up.
> > > If we don't already have it, we should have a general issue
> > ticket on
> > > GitHub for the broader feature, and include a note about this
> > > particular detail there.
> > > Even if we label it "won't fix," at least we have the
> > documentation
> > > in one place.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017, 5:44 AM Malte Roedl <malte.ro...@postgrad.mb
> > s.ac
> > > .uk> wrote:
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > according to the APA style guidelines, which have many
> > adoptions in
> > > > various CSL-styles, it is mandatory to have 'and' connecting
> > > > authors in
> > > > narrative, and '&' connecting authors in parenthetical
> > > > citations[1].
> > > >
> > > > None of the styles I tried were accommodating for this rule.
> > > >
> > > > So then I've tried to build a if-else-control structure to
> > identify
> > > > whether it is a narrative or a parenthetical citation, but it
> > seems
> > > > that the processor would do that automatically by using
> > "prefix"
> > > > and
> > > > "suffix"?
> > > > Is there any way to identify in the csl-file what type of
> > citation
> > > > is
> > > > calling the evaluation?
> > > > Or even better, is there already an existing style that
> > > > accommodates
> > > > for my issue (I could not find one, but that may be because of
> > very
> > > > vague and ubiquitous search terms).
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks!
> > > >    Malte
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APA_style#In-text_citati
> > ons
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> > > > -------------
> > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > xbiblio-devel mailing list
> > > > xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> > > -----------
> > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > xbiblio-devel mailing list
> > > xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > xbiblio-devel mailing list
> > xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> xbiblio-devel mailing list
> xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
xbiblio-devel mailing list
xbiblio-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel

Reply via email to