if this contoversity leads to something useful i´m happy with that title ;)
concerning the auto-updating, i fully agree. updating the UI isn´t really
comparabable to updating a scraper etc so it should be treated differently
perhaps.
and only giving skinners the possibitly to add options and not to remove
them wil definitely not push the overall quality of the repo skins. options
aren´t neccessarily good, you have the same discussions concerning the
"xbmc-own" settings often enough.
On May 23, 2012 1:05 AM, Jezz_X <[email protected]> wrote:
> First off congratulations on the most controversial pull request yet :)
> Second I think this might come back to a bigger issue of having "Auto
> update Add-ons" on by default (is it I can't remember) Auto update
> tends to make sense for security type patches in programs but in apps
> not so much. If a person chooses to enable auto update then as far
> as I'm concerned its buyer beware for not verifying you like changes
> before you update it
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Xbmc-addons mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbmc-addons
