Hi Christopher, Having a dependency on 'libssl.so.6()(64bit)' is actually the minimal binary dependency. It's the nature of dynamic shared libraries to require the name of the library and its major number.
In other words, libssl.so.10 is not binary compatible with libssl.so.6. On 01/16/2013 03:19 PM, Christopher Maestas wrote: > Is it possible to allow conserver to be less dependent on the specific > version of libssl and libcrypto? > > If I have a newer version of openssl-libs installed, it balks at the > version number. Maybe it can just require openssl >= SOMEVERSION instead? > > ==== > Error: Package: conserver-xcat-8.1.16-9.x86_64 (xcat-dep) > Requires: libssl.so.6()(64bit) > Error: Package: conserver-xcat-8.1.16-9.x86_64 (xcat-dep) > Requires: libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) > You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem > You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest > === > > This is from the stable and snap repos. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery > and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - > 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. > SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 > > > > _______________________________________________ > xCAT-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 _______________________________________________ xCAT-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user
