Thanks Garrick. I should've mentioned I was trying this with fedora core
18. Anything I can do to help resolve this? I figure maybe the first step
is to try and recompile conserver-xcat*.srpm ...
On Jan 16, 2013 5:09 PM, "Garrick Staples" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Christopher,
>
> Having a dependency on 'libssl.so.6()(64bit)' is actually the minimal
> binary dependency. It's the nature of dynamic shared libraries to
> require the name of the library and its major number.
>
> In other words, libssl.so.10 is not binary compatible with libssl.so.6.
>
>
> On 01/16/2013 03:19 PM, Christopher Maestas wrote:
> > Is it possible to allow conserver to be less dependent on the specific
> > version of libssl and libcrypto?
> >
> > If I have a newer version of openssl-libs installed, it balks at the
> > version number. Maybe it can just require openssl >= SOMEVERSION
instead?
> >
> > ====
> > Error: Package: conserver-xcat-8.1.16-9.x86_64 (xcat-dep)
> > Requires: libssl.so.6()(64bit)
> > Error: Package: conserver-xcat-8.1.16-9.x86_64 (xcat-dep)
> > Requires: libcrypto.so.6()(64bit)
> > You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> > You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> > ===
> >
> > This is from the stable and snap repos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
_______________________________________________
xCAT-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user
