We have stable releases already. They are on the xcpu website at
sourceforge: xcpu.sf.net .
Can someone redirect the xcpu.org website to xcpu.sf.net? Thanks.
On Mar 6, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Hugh Greenberg wrote:
On sourceforge we are now at revision 757.
We would like to have a stable release cycle, but we haven't really
had
that much time to work on XCPU recently. I plan to create a tarball
and
RPMs out of the current revision and put it on sourceforge today.
We still have funding for it, but we have other projects as well that
are currently taking higher priority.
I don't know what versions people are using.
--
Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 08:38 -0800, Greg Kurtzer wrote:
Hello guys!
Right now Caos and Perceus are at XCPU SVN release 733 and once this
gets commited is it recommended to update to 734?
Is there still a push to get a stable and development release cycle
for XCPU? Having a 1.0 that gets bug fixes only would be very good
for
people that are trying to count on this for production systems.
What is the status of development of XCPU? Is there funding or other
sources for development efforts that are being planned?
Also, what versions are other people using as stable (e.g. RR, and/or
other production systems)?
Thanks!
Greg
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
Attached is a patch from Abhishek that he sent me a while back,
but I
never got a chance to look at. It removes the old checksum
algorithm
and uses a rolling adler32 checksum from libz. This greatly
improves
XGet's performance.
He also fixed a bug related to the error handling in respondreqs.
-
Hugh Greenberg
Los Alamos National Laboratory, CCS-1
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (505) 665-6471
--
Hugh Greenberg
Los Alamos National Laboratory, CCS-1
[email protected]
