I am running version 755 of sxcpu. My system works quite well, except for the bjs batch queuing system, which is killing jobs, apparently randomly. I have reported a bunch of bugs for bjs.
Daniel On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > On sourceforge we are now at revision 757. > > We would like to have a stable release cycle, but we haven't really had > that much time to work on XCPU recently. I plan to create a tarball and > RPMs out of the current revision and put it on sourceforge today. > > We still have funding for it, but we have other projects as well that > are currently taking higher priority. > > I don't know what versions people are using. > > -- > Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> > > > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 08:38 -0800, Greg Kurtzer wrote: >> Hello guys! >> >> Right now Caos and Perceus are at XCPU SVN release 733 and once this >> gets commited is it recommended to update to 734? >> >> Is there still a push to get a stable and development release cycle >> for XCPU? Having a 1.0 that gets bug fixes only would be very good for >> people that are trying to count on this for production systems. >> >> What is the status of development of XCPU? Is there funding or other >> sources for development efforts that are being planned? >> >> Also, what versions are other people using as stable (e.g. RR, and/or >> other production systems)? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Greg >> >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Attached is a patch from Abhishek that he sent me a while back, but I >> > never got a chance to look at. It removes the old checksum algorithm >> > and uses a rolling adler32 checksum from libz. This greatly improves >> > XGet's performance. >> > >> > He also fixed a bug related to the error handling in respondreqs. >> > >> > - >> > Hugh Greenberg >> > Los Alamos National Laboratory, CCS-1 >> > Email: [email protected] >> > Phone: (505) 665-6471 >> > >> > >> >> >> > >
