This is very nice. Just a couple of issues of issues: The http://xcpu.sourceforge.net/faqs/ and http://xcpu.sourceforge.net/docs/ pages linked from the front page are broken.
And it would be nice to get an announcement in the list when new releases are made, I wasn't even aware that 1.2.2 was released (or that the new site was up at all). I have a small collection of shell scripts to help me automate the tedious tasks of making releases, posting announcements, upload tarballs, updating freshmeat, and other such annoying stuff. You can find them at http://repo.cat-v.org/releaser/ It integrates well with the werc web content management system that I built for Plan 9's GSoC and is now being used by Glendix, pq and a few other projects: http://werc.cat-v.org Anyway, great work! I will post an announcement about the 1.2.2 release and the new website to http://NineTimes.cat-v.org Peace uriel On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have stable releases already. They are on the xcpu website at > sourceforge: xcpu.sf.net . > > Can someone redirect the xcpu.org website to xcpu.sf.net? Thanks. > > On Mar 6, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Hugh Greenberg wrote: > >> >> On sourceforge we are now at revision 757. >> >> We would like to have a stable release cycle, but we haven't really had >> that much time to work on XCPU recently. I plan to create a tarball and >> RPMs out of the current revision and put it on sourceforge today. >> >> We still have funding for it, but we have other projects as well that >> are currently taking higher priority. >> >> I don't know what versions people are using. >> >> -- >> Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> >> >> >> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 08:38 -0800, Greg Kurtzer wrote: >>> >>> Hello guys! >>> >>> Right now Caos and Perceus are at XCPU SVN release 733 and once this >>> gets commited is it recommended to update to 734? >>> >>> Is there still a push to get a stable and development release cycle >>> for XCPU? Having a 1.0 that gets bug fixes only would be very good for >>> people that are trying to count on this for production systems. >>> >>> What is the status of development of XCPU? Is there funding or other >>> sources for development efforts that are being planned? >>> >>> Also, what versions are other people using as stable (e.g. RR, and/or >>> other production systems)? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Greg >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Hugh Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Attached is a patch from Abhishek that he sent me a while back, but I >>>> never got a chance to look at. It removes the old checksum algorithm >>>> and uses a rolling adler32 checksum from libz. This greatly improves >>>> XGet's performance. >>>> >>>> He also fixed a bug related to the error handling in respondreqs. >>>> >>>> - >>>> Hugh Greenberg >>>> Los Alamos National Laboratory, CCS-1 >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Phone: (505) 665-6471 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > Hugh Greenberg > Los Alamos National Laboratory, CCS-1 > [email protected] > > > > >
