On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Anyone else see anything like this? Looks like random corruption somewhere > in the control stream between xrx and xcpufs.... > > [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > Thu Mar 12 10:48:33 CDT 2009 > [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > namespace: invalid operation 9Of~ > xnamespace failed: : No child processes > [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > namespace: invalid operation #9PhA > xnamespace failed: : No child processes > [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > namespace: invalid operation Î0A > xnamespace failed: : No child processes > [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > namespace: invalid operation w§ºQ > xnamespace failed: : No child processes > [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > Thu Mar 12 10:48:44 CDT 2009 > > I can't reproduce this anymore. But does the following patch from http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00068.html fix the issue for you? Index: xcpufs/xcpufs.c =================================================================== --- xcpufs/xcpufs.c (revision 691) +++ xcpufs/xcpufs.c (working copy) @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ s = p; } - bufwrite(&buf, buf.size, strlen(s), s); + bufwrite(&buf, buf.size, (slen + str - s), s); b = 0; bufwrite(&buf, buf.size, 1, &b);
