That patch got buried in the queue somewhere. Should I take this as an ack?

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> I haven't seen the problem since I patched and that includes a demo, so
> it's passed a murphy's law barrier as well.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> Do you still see problems with that change?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   Lucho
>>
>> On Mar 12, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
>>
>>  That does seem much more stable...
>>>
>>>      -eric
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 12, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Abhishek Kulkarni wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Anyone else see anything like this?  Looks like random corruption
>>>> somewhere in the control stream between xrx and xcpufs....
>>>>
>>>> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date
>>>> Thu Mar 12 10:48:33 CDT 2009
>>>> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date
>>>> namespace: invalid operation 9Of~
>>>> xnamespace failed: : No child processes
>>>> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date
>>>> namespace: invalid operation #9PhA
>>>> xnamespace failed: : No child processes
>>>> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date
>>>> namespace: invalid operation Î0A
>>>> xnamespace failed: : No child processes
>>>> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date
>>>> namespace: invalid operation w§ºQ
>>>> xnamespace failed: : No child processes
>>>> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date
>>>> Thu Mar 12 10:48:44 CDT 2009
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can't reproduce this anymore. But does the following patch from
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00068.html
>>>> fix the issue for you?
>>>>
>>>> Index: xcpufs/xcpufs.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- xcpufs/xcpufs.c     (revision 691)
>>>> +++ xcpufs/xcpufs.c     (working copy)
>>>> @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@
>>>>               s = p;
>>>>       }
>>>> -       bufwrite(&buf, buf.size, strlen(s), s);
>>>> +       bufwrite(&buf, buf.size, (slen + str - s), s);
>>>>       b = 0;
>>>>       bufwrite(&buf, buf.size, 1, &b);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to