On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>wrote:
> > I just tripped over this in a fresh checkout of the xcpu2 code from > sourceforge, whose responsible for comiting the patch now that its > ack'd. > My bad, I didn't see the ack at all. Thanks for the gentle reminder, r758. > > -eric > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]> > > > > On Mar 15, 2009, at 11:30 PM, Abhishek Kulkarni wrote: > > > >> That patch got buried in the queue somewhere. Should I take this as an > >> ack? > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> I haven't seen the problem since I patched and that includes a demo, so > >> it's passed a murphy's law barrier as well. > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> > >> On Mar 12, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Do you still see problems with that change? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Lucho > >> > >> On Mar 12, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > >> > >> That does seem much more stable... > >> > >> -eric > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mar 12, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Abhishek Kulkarni wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> Anyone else see anything like this? Looks like random corruption > >> somewhere in the control stream between xrx and xcpufs.... > >> > >> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > >> Thu Mar 12 10:48:33 CDT 2009 > >> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > >> namespace: invalid operation 9Of~ > >> xnamespace failed: : No child processes > >> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > >> namespace: invalid operation #9PhA > >> xnamespace failed: : No child processes > >> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > >> namespace: invalid operation Î0A > >> xnamespace failed: : No child processes > >> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > >> namespace: invalid operation w§ºQ > >> xnamespace failed: : No child processes > >> [r...@arlx050 ~]# sphinx/xcpu2/utils/xrx 9.3.61.111 /bin/date > >> Thu Mar 12 10:48:44 CDT 2009 > >> > >> > >> I can't reproduce this anymore. But does the following patch from > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00068.html > >> fix the issue for you? > >> > >> Index: xcpufs/xcpufs.c > >> =================================================================== > >> --- xcpufs/xcpufs.c (revision 691) > >> +++ xcpufs/xcpufs.c (working copy) > >> @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ > >> s = p; > >> } > >> - bufwrite(&buf, buf.size, strlen(s), s); > >> + bufwrite(&buf, buf.size, (slen + str - s), s); > >> b = 0; > >> bufwrite(&buf, buf.size, 1, &b); > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >
