"The MacCready setting is not supposed to be a knob to degrade the
polar to make it realistic (use the "bugs" setting), and neither is it
a tool to account for head wind (use the "wind" setting)."
Correct, but consequently shouldn't you abandon the "safety MC value" also?
and introduce a different concept to degrade performance. MC is currently
easier to use, than bugs.
Sascha
________________________________
Von: Max Kellermann <m...@duempel.org>
An: Michael Schlotter <michael.schlot...@gmx.de>
Cc: xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Gesendet: 12:21 Mittwoch, 23.November 2011
Betreff: Re: [Xcsoar-user] XCSoar 6.2.3 released
On 2011/11/23 12:15, Michael Schlotter <michael.schlot...@gmx.de> wrote:
> IMO changing to 0 MC is not really a good option, as it gives overly
> optimistic numbers. It is very hard to fly exactly at the best
> glide speed, never mind getting the polar right for the glider.
You're using the wrong tool for the job.
Max
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Xcsoar-user mailing list
Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
