On 2011/11/23 17:23, Ramy Yanetz <ryan...@yahoo.com> wrote: > unless you consider 5000 feet fluctuation on arrival altitude in > couple of minutes a stable value.
After 2 days of discussion, I still don't see your ticket describing this very problem, demonstrating how to reproduce it. > Can we all conclude this discussion that XCSoar needs an urgent fix No, we can't. Your continued alarmism is annoying and doesn't add to your credibility. Your problem isn't the most important one in the world, and your feature request (that's what it is) does not need an "urgent fix". Very recently, we had serious calculation problems that needed urgent fixes, and after a few night shifts, we did publish new maintenance releases after we figured them out. Your request is nowhere near that. Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Xcsoar-user mailing list Xcsoar-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
